### Last forum posts

- Re: JANUS frequency-band proposal of EDA-SALSA consortium
- Re: JANUS frequency-band proposal of EDA-SALSA consortium
- JANUS frequency-band proposal of EDA-SALSA consortium
- Re: Please generate a EMCON-forum
- Please generate a EMCON-forum
- Publication of an updated version (v0.2) of the JANUS Emergency messages specification proposal
- Announcing the 2019 JANUS Workshop
- Re: Publication of an updated version (v0.2) of the JANUS Underwater AIS message specification proposal
- Publication of an updated version (v0.2) of the JANUS Underwater AIS message specification proposal
- Latest Tool-kit

## Revision of JANUS STANAG next year in March

in the ANEP you can find our concerns about the "Values provided in Table in Annex B are likely not to be implementable in the hardware to be used in the given accuracy." page V

The same for ANNEX C. Here the case is more difficult! The values of

the table C-1 are not fitting to the formula, in my view. If you are

using 50 digits, the correct basis is not

1.176769793407883 it is

1.176769793407882894...

to generate the values of the table.

If you have the accuracy (only MAPLE, MATHEMATICA, ... - not on a

simple computer) you can calculate the index correctly

Index = ln(time in s)/ln(1.176769793407882894...) + 21

We have to change it to fix "human readable" numbers:

Proposal: frac(1000*FunctionValue(Index))/1000

BR Ivor

Reads: 422794