Last forum posts
- Re: Re: Discussion in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on direct Remote Identification of civilian Unmanned Underwater Systems via JANUS
- Re: Discussion in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on direct Remote Identification of civilian Unmanned Underwater Systems via JANUS
- DISSUB
- Discussion in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on direct Remote Identification of civilian Unmanned Underwater Systems via JANUS
- Re: Re: The concept behind the user-classes inside of JANUS
- New Waveforms/Protocols in JANUS
- JANUS support in UnetStack
- Re: The concept behind the user-classes inside of JANUS
- The concept behind the user-classes inside of JANUS
- Re: Revision of JANUS STANAG next year in March
Revision of JANUS STANAG next year in March
in the ANEP you can find our concerns about the "Values provided in Table in Annex B are likely not to be implementable in the hardware to be used in the given accuracy." page V
The same for ANNEX C. Here the case is more difficult! The values of
the table C-1 are not fitting to the formula, in my view. If you are
using 50 digits, the correct basis is not
1.176769793407883 it is
1.176769793407882894...
to generate the values of the table.
If you have the accuracy (only MAPLE, MATHEMATICA, ... - not on a
simple computer) you can calculate the index correctly
Index = ln(time in s)/ln(1.176769793407882894...) + 21
We have to change it to fix "human readable" numbers:
Proposal: frac(1000*FunctionValue(Index))/1000
BR Ivor